I attempt my own answer largely based on Douglas Gaskings concept of “incorrigibility”, which he uses to distinguish the non-empirical from the empirical. (Generally, something is corrigible if it can be subjected to revision or correction.) The focus is mainly on the *propositions* of maths (but not necessarily the principles or laws which govern it), and then on logic. I argue that based on “(…
No comments yet.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL